Bijlagen bij COM(2005)122-1 - Kaderprogramma met betrekking tot grondrechten en justitie voor de periode 2007-2013

Dit is een beperkte versie

U kijkt naar een beperkte versie van dit dossier in de EU Monitor.

Agreement, in accordance with its provisions.

4. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES

4.1. Financial Resources

4.1.1. Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA)

EUR million (to 3 decimal places)

…………………… | f |

TOTAL CA including co-financing | a+c+d+e+f |

4.1.2. Compatibility with Financial Programming

X Proposal is compatible with next financial programming 2007-2013

( Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective.

( Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement[67] (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the financial perspective).

4.1.3. Financial impact on Revenue

( Proposal has no financial implications on revenue

X Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows:

Contribution from EFTA/EEE States: 2,19 % (2004 figures)

EUR million (to one decimal place)

Prior to action | Situation following action |

Total number of human resources | 37,5 | 40 | 44 | 47,5 | 51 | 54 | 54 |

5. CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES

5.1. Need to be met in the short or long term

5.1.1. Civil Justice

The promotion and the protection of fundamental rights demand the establishment of a genuine European area of justice. In such an area competent judicial authorities co-operate effectively, and citizens have a better access to justice and are neither prevented nor discouraged from exercising their rights by incompatibilities and complexities of the legal systems, judicial decisions circulate freely among the Member States on the basis of the principle of mutual recognition of judicial decisions, and the good functioning of the judiciary is constantly improved.

The challenge for the Union will be to respond to citizens’ expectations for effective solutions to their practical problems. This will imply in particular:

- as the acquis grows, increased efforts of monitoring of its application by the Member States, including through modern means such as databases of case law;

- further legislative action to address the new issues mentioned above, and to improve the ease of access to and efficiency of justice;

- a need to address mutual recognition in a wider sense, including recognition of decisions and documents other than those issued by judicial authorities;

- strengthening of mechanisms for providing information to the public and promote training of and exchanges between practitioners on the implications of the instruments for cooperation in this area;

- further measures to promote understanding and use of common tools and procedures amongst practitioners.

5.1.2. Criminal Justice

The challenge for the Union will be to respond to citizens’ expectations for effective solutions to their practical problems. This will imply in particular:

- as the acquis grows, increased efforts of monitoring of its application by the Member States, including through modern means such as databases of case law;

- further legislative action to address the new issues mentioned above, and to improve the ease of access to and efficiency of justice;

- a need to address mutual recognition in a wider sense, including recognition of decisions and documents other than those issued by judicial authorities;

- strengthening of mechanisms for providing information to the public and promote training of and exchanges between practitioners on the implications of the instruments for cooperation in this area;

- legislative measures to put in place and develop common tools for cooperation. This implies inter alia on the one hand more efficient mechanisms of exchange of information between Member States on criminals, in particular on convicted persons by setting up a computerised mechanism to exchange information on criminal records, and on the other hand, to improve standards for certain procedures such as rules on evidence collection and rules on the protection of individuals involved in criminal proceedings, whether they are the accused, witnesses or victims;

- further measures to promote understanding and use of common tools and procedures amongst practitioners.

5.1.3 Fundamental Rights and Justice

The aim of this specific programme of the programme “Fundamental Rights and Justice” is to develop significantly the two existing preparatory actions (promotion of fundamental rights and support to civil society) introducing new objectives such as the fight against racism, xenophobia and anti-semitism namely through the promotion of an inter-faith and a multicultural dialogue at EU level.

The support to civil society in the field of fundamental rights will be enlarged to cover all Member States while the present preparatory action only covers the ten new Member States.

A special focus will be put on the rights deriving from the citizenship of the Union, recognised as fundamental rights by the Charter, namely to encourage democratic participation.

A significant increase in the financial envelope is planned to reflect the increasing importance of these issues and to respond positively to civil society actors.

5.1.4 Fight against violence (Daphne) and drugs prevention and information

The main challenges facing the Union in relation to tackling drugs over the period of the next financial perspectives can be defined as follows:

- information and research, including the continuation of the work of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA);

- drug demand reduction since demand feeds the growth of the drugs phenomenon: education, prevention and harm-reduction programmes;

- drug supply reduction, to stop trafficking and drug-related criminality, in particular as concerns new synthetic drugs and their chemical precursors, as well as combating money-laundering;

- enhanced cooperation with third countries concerning drug abuse control and drug demand reduction.

- further legislative activity will be needed in line with new and developing forms of drugs, for example to bring new forms of drugs under established control mechanisms.

Fight against violence (Daphne programme)

The mid term and the final report on the Daphne programme (2000 – 2003) show that organisations have gained from their participation in European partnerships. Bringing associations to work together resulted in more effective programming and better use of resources.

The Daphne programme can thus be seen as successful in mobilising the civil society resulting in partnerships and alliances that are working together for more comprehensive European policies on violence.

The final report of the Daphne programme (2000 – 2003) revealed that there was some room to improvement such as the creation of a helpdesk and an increased focus on dissemination. The Daphne II programme was thus adapted to conform to the finding of that report.

As these changes to the structure of the programme are quite recent, no significant changes need to be introduced.

5.2. Value-added of Community involvement and coherence of the proposal with other financial instruments and possible synergy

The European Union added value will be achieved by:

- preparing the ground for the emergence of common strategies and legislation in this field;

- implementing EU policy objectives and their application in national policies;

- supporting the transposition of European Union legislation's and its application in a uniform way through Europe;

- promoting the co-operation and co-ordination mechanisms between Member States;

- cooperating with civil society organisations at European level.

Criteria for evaluation

A set of common evaluation criteria will be used through all specific programmes to evaluate the success of the interventions regarding the European Union added value in relation with the type of effect described above. Example of criteria could be:

- To support only activities needed at European Union level to sustain European Union objectives, European Union laws and European Union implementation mechanism;

- To support activities which will be complementary with those financed at national level;

- To reinforce national exchanges at European Union level, generating synergy effects and economies of scale;

- To involve actively Member States representatives and other relevant stakeholders in the implementation of the programme in order to maximise complementarities with existing activities.

Subsidiarity and proportionality

As far as subsidiarity is concerned the present programme focuses on areas where European added value can be demonstrated and therefore is designed to respect the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality set out in Article 5 of the EC Treaty and its accompanying Protocol.

As far as proportionality is concerned, the new programme proposal has been designed to incorporate the maximum feasible extent of simplification in terms not only of the form of the action but also in terms of the administrative and financial requirements that will apply to their implementation. The programme has been designed to strike to find the right balance between flexibility and ease of use on the one hand, and clarity of purpose and appropriate financial and procedural safeguards on the other.

Complementarity with other Community interventions

The present programme aims at contributing to the establishment of an area of freedom, security and justice. A complementarity with other programmes may thus be possible.

A non exhaustive list of areas of convergence can be mentioned:

- The draft of the present programme took into account the Programme on Active Citizenship and the Youth programme to ensure that no overlap situations existed. In any case, particular attention will be paid to the implementation of those programmes to avoid such situations and to coordinate the results.

- The draft of the present programme took into account the Programme for Employment and Social Security - PROGRESS to ensure that no overlap situations existed. Particular attention will be paid to the implementation of the programme to avoid such situations and to coordinate the results.

- The current proposal is complementary to some actions under the 7th framework programme. Synergies will be actively promoted whenever possible, namely as regards the application of research results.

- Special attention will be paid to the programmes implemented by in the field of Information Society, related with safe use of Internet and fighting its abuse, in particular as regards sensitive groups (e.g. children).

- The current proposal will also seek to complement the work of EU Agencies active in these policy fields (EUMC, EMCDDA, Eurojust), as well as with the action of other international organisations acting in the field of fundamental rights, drugs action, fight against violence and judicial cooperation.

Regular exchanges of information and active collaboration around projects under other Community programmes will take place, in order to improve and capitalise upon internal coherence, and between the Commission and other national and international authorities/organisations, to improve external coherence.

Complementarities with interventions on Freedom, Security and Justice

These interventions have a common goal of establishing an area of freedom, security and justice where basic human rights are respected. Each of the programmes is designed to address particular aspects which are a critical part of the creation of such an area in the EU, given the integration of national economies and the goal of ensuring free movement of people as well as goods, services and capital between countries. As such, they tackle issues affecting freedom, security and justice which arise from the creation of economic and monetary union and the abolition of internal borders and which can only be effectively addressed at EU level. These issues are to do with cooperation, harmonisation, coordination of activities, the exchange and sharing of critical information and best practices and techniques, and establishing solidarity mechanisms for sharing the costs involved in pursuing common and agreed objectives in an equitable way.

They are reflected in the objectives set out in The Hague Programme adopted by the European Council in November 2004, which include: guarantying fundamental human rights throughout the EU, establishing minimum procedural safeguards and common access to justice, extending the mutual recognition of judicial decisions, fighting organised cross-border crime and the threat of terrorism, ensuring protection in accordance with international treaties to those in need, and regulating migration flows and controlling the external borders of the EU. Each of the programmes is aimed at pursuing these objectives in a complementary way without duplicating activities.

The activities under the programme “Fundamental Rights and Justice”, therefore, are designed to further fundamental human rights and ensure a common level of access to justice across the EU, and are accordingly complementary to activities under the other two programmes which reinforce this objective. In particular, they are directly complementary to the measures, under the Solidarity programme to improve the integration of migrants into EU society as well as to establish uniform procedures for dealing with asylum-seekers and, under the Security programme, to enhance protection of witnesses and victims of crime as well as to combat the trafficking of people.

They are also complementary, if less directly, with activities under the Security programme to strengthen cooperation between police forces and law enforcement authorities as well as between bodies involved in combating the threat of terrorism. The freedom of EU citizens to enjoy their fundamental rights, therefore, is contingent on them feeling secure and being adequately protected against criminal activity or terrorist attack.

5.3. Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context of the ABM framework

General objectives | Specific objectives | Operational objectives |

To promote the development of a European society based on the European Union citizenship and respectful of the fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. | To promote the Charter of Fundamental Rights and to inform citizens of their rights as Union citizens and to encourage them to participate actively in the democratic life of the Union. | To support awareness-raising actions. |

To monitor regularly the situation of fundamental rights in the European Union and its Member States using the Charter of Fundamental Rights as the guiding document and to obtain opinions on specific questions related to fundamental rights when necessary. | To prepare regular reports or opinions on the situation of fundamental rights in the EU. |

To explain the consequences of the insertion of the Charter of Fundamental Rights into the Constitution and of the European Union’s accession to the European Convention of Human Rights. | To support information campaigns in these fields. |

To fight against anti-semitism, racism and xenophobia and to strengthen civil society in the field of fundamental rights. | To support NGO and other bodies from civil society to enhance their capability to participate actively in the development of the European Union. To fight against anti-semitism, racism and xenophobia by promoting a better understanding and improved tolerance throughout the European Union. To promote peace and fundamental rights namely through an interfaith and multicultural dialogue at EU level. | To have open, transparent and regular dialogue with civil society. To support awareness-raising actions. To provide financial support for the activities of non-governmental organisations or other entities pursuing an aim of general European interest. To undertake studies and analyses in these fields. |

To promote judicial cooperation with the aim of contributing to the creation of a genuine European area of justice in civil and criminal matters. | To adapt the existing judicial system in Member States to the European Union being a territory without border controls, with a single currency, free circulation of persons, services, goods and capital, based on mutual recognition and mutual confidence. | To improve mutual knowledge of Member States’ legal and judicial systems in civil and criminal matters and to promote and strengthen networking, mutual cooperation, exchange and dissemination of information, experience and best practices. To ensure the sound implementation, the correct and concrete application and the evaluation of Community instruments in the areas of judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters and in criminal matters. |

To improve the daily life of individuals and businesses by enabling them to assert their rights throughout the European Union, notably by fostering access to justice. | To improve information on the legal systems in the Member States and access to justice. |

To improve the contacts between legal, judicial and administrative authorities and the legal professions, and to foster the training of the members of the judiciary. | To promote the training in Union matters of the judiciary and judicial staff. To evaluate the general conditions necessary to develop mutual confidence, including the quality of justice. To support the operative work of the European judicial network in civil and commercial matters created by Council Decision of 28 May 2001 (2001/470/CE). To develop a European computerised system of exchange of information on criminal records and to support studies to develop other types of exchange of information. |

To contribute to the setting up of an area of freedom, security and justice by combating violence and by informing on and preventing drug use. | To protect citizens against violence and to attain a high level of health protection, well being and social cohesion. | To prevent and combat all forms of violence occurring in the public or the private domain, against children, young people and women To provide support for victims and groups at risk. To assist and encourage NGO and other organisations active in this field. To disseminate the results obtained under the two Daphne programmes including their adaptation, transfer and use by other beneficiaries or in other geographical areas. To identify and enhance actions contributing to positive treatment of people at risk of violence. |

To prevent and reduce drug use, dependence and drug related harms. | To involve civil society in the implementation and development of the European Union’s Drugs Strategy and Action plans. To monitor, implement and evaluate the implementation of specific actions under the Drugs Action Plans 2005 – 2008 and 2009 – 2012. |

To promote transnational and awareness-raising actions in the areas identified above. | To set up multidisciplinary networks; to ensure the expansion of the knowledge base, the exchange of information and the identification and dissemination of good practice, including through training, study visits and staff exchange. To develop and implement awareness-raising actions targeted at specific audiences to promote the adoption of zero tolerance towards violence and to encourage support for victims and the reporting of violence. To raise awareness of the health and social problems caused by drug abuse and to encourage an open dialogue with a view to promoting a better understanding of the drug phenomenon. |

5.4. Method of Implementation

Show below the method(s) chosen for the implementation of the action.

X Centralised Management

X Directly by the Commission

ٱIndirectly by delegation to:

ٱ Executive Agencies

ٱ Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art. 185 of the Financial Regulation

ٱ National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission

ٱ Shared or decentralised management

ٱ With Member states

ٱ With Third countries

ٱ Joint management with international organisations (please specify)

Relevant comments:

In order to achieve the full objectives of the programme under the provisions of the Current Treaty, it has been decided to split into 4 legal instruments relating to 4 different legal bases. As stated in Mr. Vitorino’s Communication to the Commission (SEC(2004) 1195, 28.9.2004) the actions proposed are provided through the current Treaties. The legal bases required to establish the programmes have been limited in number as far as the current Treaties allow, while within and across the new programmes common delivery, management and implementation mechanisms are set in place.

In order to achieve the general and specific and operational objectives, each programme within the programme “Fundamental Rights and Justice” envisages a range of actions, such as:

- Specific actions taken by the Commission, such as, studies and research, opinion polls and surveys, the formulation of indicators and common methodologies, collection, development and dissemination of data and statistics, seminars, conferences and experts meetings, organisation of public campaigns and events, development and maintenance of websites, preparation and dissemination of information materials, support to and animation of networks of national experts, analytical, monitoring and evaluation activities;

- Actions providing financial support for specific projects of Community interest under the conditions set out in the annual work programmes;

- Actions providing financial support for the activities of non-governmental organisations or other entities under the conditions set our in the annual work programmes;

- Operative grants to entities identified in a legal basis.

Methods of implementation:

The above mentioned type of actions may be financed either by

- A service contract following a call for tenders

- A subsidy following a call for proposals.

- Subsidies to a body pursuing an aim of general European interest, without a call for proposal.

The Commission will implement the above actions in accordance with the annual work programme to be adopted. The Commission will implement this programme and may have recourse to technical and/or administrative assistance to the mutual benefit of the Commission and of the beneficiaries, for example to finance outside expertise on a specific subject.

The Commission may decide to entrust part of the budget implementation to an executive agency, as referred to in Article 54, (2) (a) of the Financial Regulation. These agencies shall be designated by the Commission in conformity with the provisions of the Financial Regulation and more specifically with the principles of economy, effectiveness and efficiency. Before proceeding to implement the delegation, the Commission shall ensure, by mean of a prior assessment that the creation of agencies is in compliance with sound financial management.

6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

6.1. Monitoring system

A comprehensive monitoring system will be set-up in order to regularly follow up the implementation of the activities carried out under each specific programme. This system should allow for the collection of information relating to the financial implementation and to the physical outputs of the programme, across the types of action and the target groups included in the programme. The information will be collected at project level - indeed, for any action financed by the programme, the beneficiary shall submit technical and financial reports on the progress of the work, as well as a final report after the completion of the action. The precise configuration of the monitoring system, as well as the type of indicators to be set-up will be the object of further study in the process leading to the implementation of the programme. Indeed, a study on delivery mechanisms and related cost-effectiveness aspects is foreseen to take place during 2005.

According to legal requirements and Commission’s evaluation policy, the programme will be evaluated at mid-term to assess its continuing relevance and draw useful lessons for the remainder of its implementation. A review of the programme may take place then, if considered necessary. A final evaluation will take place at the end of the programming period to assess the results of the programme and advise on its follow-up. These reports will be prepared under the responsibility of the Commission, and shall be submitted to the European Parliament and the Council.

6.2. Evaluation

6.2.1. Ex-ante evaluation

Cfr. Extended Impact Assessment on the programme “Fundamental Rights and Justice”.

6.2.2. Measures taken following an intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned from similar experiences in the past)

Cfr. Extended Impact Assessment on the programme “Fundamental Rights and Justice”.

6.2.3. Terms and frequency of future evaluation

The timetable set in the proposal is as follows:

- no later than 31 March 2011, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an interim evaluation report on the results obtained and the qualitative and quantitative aspects of the implementation of this programme;

- no later than 30 August 2012, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a Communication on the continuation of this programme;

- no later than 31 December 2014, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council an ex post evaluation report.

7. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES

The Commission shall ensure that, when actions financed under the present programme are implemented, the financial interests of the Community are protected by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by effective checks and by the recovery of the amounts unduly paid and, if irregularities are detected, by effective, proportional and dissuasive penalties, in accordance with Council Regulations (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 and (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96, and with Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

For the Community actions financed under this programme, the notion of irregularity referred to in Article 1, paragraph 2 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 shall mean any infringement of a provision of Community law or any breach of a contractual obligation resulting from an act or omission by an economic operator, which has, or would have, the effect of prejudicing the general budget of the Communities or budgets managed by them, by an unjustifiable item of expenditure.

Contracts and agreements shall provide in particular for supervision and financial control by the Commission (or any representative authorized by it) and audits by the Court of Auditors, if necessary on-the-spot.

8. DETAILS OF RESOURCES

8.1. Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost (Prix 2004)

Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)

2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |

Officials or temporary staff (XX 01 01) | A*/AD | 9,25 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 13,5 | 13,5 |

B*, C*/AST | 21,25 | 23 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 31 | 31 |

Staff financed by art. XX 01 02 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8,5 | 9 | 9,5 | 9,5 |

Other staff financed by art. XX 01 04/05 |

TOTAL | 37,5 | 40 | 44 | 47,5 | 51 | 54 | 54 |

8.2.2. Description of tasks deriving from the actio n

Task N° | Title | Description | Number |

MANAGEMENT |

1 | Management | 2 |

POLICY DEFINITION AND PROGRAMMING |

2 | Policy Making | Definition of strategy, legal base,… | 3 |

3 | Programme definition | Establishment of annual work programme (i.e. financing decision) and interservice consultation | 0,5 |

4 | Interface with relevant EC programmes & actions | interservice coordination in order to ensure complementarity-synergy with other policies | 1 |

5 | Interface with other Institutions and Member States | Interface Council, EP ensuring the appropriate reporting, information, questions, briefing requests | 0,5 |

6 | Information and Communication | 1. Information and publicity activities 2. EUROPA Web site | 0,5 |

7 | Committee interface - chair & secretariat | 1 |

8 | Budgeting | APS,PDB,AAR,BIP,RAL - Preparation - Follow-up - Reporting | 0,5 |

PROGRAMME : RECEPTION, SELECTION AND AWARD OF PROJECTS, FINANCIAL AND LEGAL COMMITMENTS |

9 | Preparation Calls for proposals | 1,5 |

10 | Reception and evaluation proposals/multi-annual and annual programmes | (also involves staff involved in 12,13,14 and 15) | 9 |

11 | Award decisions | 0,5 |

12 | Financial Commitment | Preparation, maintenance and closure of all financial commitments + sub consequent amendments | 1,5 |

13 | Legal Commitment | Preparation, Signature, Closure of all juridical commitments + sub consequent amendments | 4 |

PROGRAMME : MONITORING OF PROJECTS |

14 | Payments - Initiation | Preparation and Processing of all Prefinancing, Intermediate and Final Payments (including verification supporting docs) | 3 |

15 | Project Monitoring | Receipt and assessment of reports , requests for information, project visits | 4 |

PROCUREMENT, CONTROL AND AUDIT |

16 | Ex- ante verification of transactions, setting up of control standards | Setting up appropriate control standards | 2 |

17 | Financial Audit | Ex-post Audit of expenditure / implementation | 2 |

18 | Internal audit | Verification of compliance with ICS | 1 |

19 | Procurement procedures | Drafting, procedures and authorisation of procurement procedures for projects and technical assistance (evaluation, studies,…) , including JPC, Helpdesk procurement procedures | 2 |

20 | Reporting | Report of Authorising Officer, RAA, relations with Court of Auditors… | 1 |

SUPPORT SERVICES |

21 | Filing and Archiving | Database, digital and hardcopy filing | 1 |

22 | Programme Evaluation | Ex ante - Mid term - Final evaluation | 1,5 |

23 | IT Support | Specific development of IT Tools related to monitoring and implementation | 2 |

OVERHEAD |

24 | Administration (Overhead) | CIS, Translations, HRM, Logistics,… | 9 |

TOTAL | 54 |

8.2.3. Sources of human resources (statutory )

(When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating from each of the sources)

( Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be replaced or extended

( Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n

( Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure

( Posts to be redeployed using existing resources within the managing service (internal redeployment)

( Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise of the year in question

8.2.4. Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – Expenditure on administrative management)

EUR million (to 3 decimal places)

Budget line | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TOTAL |

(number and heading) |

- intra muros |

- extra muros Development IT and other management tools | 0,960 | 1,030 | 1,100 | 1,240 | 1,320 | 1,410 | 1,430 | 8,490 |

Studies | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,120 | 0,120 | 0,790 |

Evaluation and Impact Assessment | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,230 | 0,230 | 0,230 | 0,240 | 1,260 |

Publications; external evaluations | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,110 | 0,120 | 0,120 | 0,790 |

Expert meetings | 0,050 | 0,050 | 0,060 | 0,060 | 0,060 | 0,060 | 0,060 | 0,400 |

Total | 1,340 | 1,410 | 1,490 | 1,750 | 1,830 | 1,940 | 1,970 | 11,730 |

8.2.5 Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the reference amount

EUR million (to 3 decimal places)

Type of human resources | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Total |

Officials and temporary staff (XX 01 01) | 3,294 | 3,564 | 3,888 | 4,212 | 4,536 | 4,806 | 4,806 | 29,106 |

Staff financed by Art XX 01 02 (auxiliary, END, contract staff, etc.) | 0,756 | 0,756 | 0,864 | 0,918 | 0,972 | 1,026 | 1,026 | 6,318 |

(specify budget line) |

1Total cost of Human Resources and associated costs (NOT in reference amount) | 4,050 | 4,320 | 4,752 | 5,130 | 5,508 | 5,832 | 5,832 | 35,424 |

Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents

Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable

Each FTE rated at 108.000 € per FTE.

Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02

Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable

Each FTE rated at 108.000 € per FTE.

8.2.6 Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount EUR million (to 3 decimal places) |

2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | TOTAL |

2007 |

XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions | 0,050 | 0,054 | 0,055 | 0,056 | 0,057 | 0,059 | 0,060 | 0,391 |

XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences | 0,150 | 0,162 | 0,179 | 0,183 | 0,187 | 0,190 | 0,194 | 1,245 |

XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees | 0,070 | 0,076 | 0,077 | 0,079 | 0,080 | 0,082 | 0,084 | 0,548 |

XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations | 0,300 | 0,325 | 0,331 | 0,338 | 0,345 | 0,351 | 0,359 | 2,348 |

XX 01 02 11 05 - Information systems | 0,100 | 0,108 | 0,110 | 0,113 | 0,115 | 0,117 | 0,120 | 0,783 |

2Total Other Management Expenditure (XX 01 02 11) | 0,670 | 0,725 | 0,753 | 0,768 | 0,784 | 0,799 | 0,815 | 5,316 |

3 Other expenditure of an administrative nature (specify including reference to budget line) |

Total Administrative expenditure, other than human resources and associated costs (NOT included in reference amount) | 4,720 | 5,045 | 5,505 | 5,898 | 6,292 | 6,631 | 6,647 | 34,092 |

Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount

2007 |

Missions | 20*1000 + 10*3000 | 50.000 |

Meetings & Conferences | 5*30000 | 150.000 |

Compulsory meetings | 2*15000 | 30.000 |

Non-compulsory meetings | 1*40000 | 40.000 |

Studies & consultations | 2*150000 | 300.000 |

Information systems | 1*100000 | 100.000 |

[1] COM(2004) 101.

[2] "Bouwen aan onze gemeenschappelijke toekomst - Beleidsuitdagingen en begrotingsmiddelen in de uitgebreide Unie 2007-2013" - COM(2004) 101 van 10.2.2004.

[3] " Vrijheid is het eenmakende beginsel, de kern van het Europese project. Maar zonder veiligheid, zonder een rechtsstelsel en een rechtspraak die door de burgers erkend worden, zouden de uitoefening van de vrijheden en de inachtneming van de democratische waarden niet verzekerd zijn. De Europese ruimte van vrijheid, veiligheid en rechtvaardigheid biedt allereerst de garantie dat de democratische beginselen en de mensenrechten gerespecteerd zullen worden . De gemeenschappelijke erkenning van deze beginselen, van essentieel belang voor het burgerschap van de Unie, is nu vastgelegd in het Handvest van de grondrechten, en vormt het voetstuk van de integratie voor al wie in de Unie verblijft." - COM(2002) 247.

[4] Artikel I-9, lid 2, van het Verdrag tot vaststelling van een grondwet voor Europa bepaalt dat de Unie toetreedt tot het Europees Verdrag tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens en de fundamentele vrijheden. Die toetreding laat de bevoegdheden van de Unie, zoals in de grondwet bepaald, onveranderd.

[5] PB L 151 van 10.6.1997, blz. 1. Verordening laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1652/2003 (PB L 245 van 29.9.2003, blz. 33).

[6] COM(2004) 693 van 25.10.2004.

[7] PB L 174 van 27.6.2001, blz. 25.

[8] PB L 63 van 6.3.2002, blz. 1. Besluit gewijzigd bij Besluit 2003/659/JHA (PB L 245 van 29.9.2003, blz. 44).

[9] PB L 36 van 12.2.1993, blz. 1. Verordening laatstelijk gewijzigd bij Verordening (EG) nr. 1651/2003 (PB L 245 van 29.9.2003, blz. 30).

[10] PB L 341 van 30.12.1994, blz. 7.

[11] COM(2004) 101 van 10.2.2004.

[12] COM(2004) 487 van 14.7.2004.

[13] COM(2002) 169 van 27.3.2002.

[14] COM(2004) 824 van 14.12.2004.

[15] COM(2002) 599 van 4.11.2002.

[16] COM(2004) 707 van 22.10.2004.

[17] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[18] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[19] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[20] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[21] PB C 364 van 18.12.2000, blz. 1

[22] PB C 59 van 23.2.2001, blz. 307.

[23] PB C 77 E van 28.3.2002, blz. 126.

[24] PB L 34 van 9.2.2000, blz.1.

[25] PB L 143 van 30.4.2004, blz. 1.

[26] COM(2004) 707.

[27] PB L 165 van 3.7.2003, blz. 31.

[28] COM(2005) 45 van 14.2.2005.

[29] PB C 172 van 18.6.1999, blz. 1

[30] PB L 248 van 16.9.2002, blz.1.

[31] PB L 357 van 31.12.2002, blz. 1.

[32] PB L 184 van 17.7.1999, blz. 23.

[33] COM(2004) 101 van 10.2.2004.

[34] COM(2004) 487 van 14.7.2004.

[35] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[36] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[37] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[38] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[39] PB C 364 van 18.12.2000, blz. 1.

[40] COM(2003) 606 van 15.10.2003.

[41] PB C 172 van 18.6.1999, blz. 1.

[42] PB L 248 van 16.9.2002, blz. 1.

[43] PB L 357 van 31.12.2002, blz. 1.

[44] PB L 184 van 17.7.1999, blz. 23.

[45] COM(2004) 101 van 10.2.2004.

[46] COM(2004) 487 van 14.7.2004.

[47] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[48] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[49] PB L 203 van 1.8.2002, blz. 5.

[50] PB C 172 van 18.6.1999, blz. 1.

[51] PB L 248 van 16.9.2002, blz. 1.

[52] PB L 357 van 31.12.2002, blz. 1.

[53] COM(2004) 101 van 10.2.2004.

[54] COM(2004) 487 van 14.7.2004.

[55] COM(2005) 34 van 9.2.2005.

[56] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[57] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[58] PB C […] van […], blz. […].

[59] PB L 287 van 8.11.1996, blz. 3.

[60] PB L 196 van 14.7.1998, blz. 24.

[61] PB L 115 van 1.5.2002, blz. 1.

[62] PB C 172 van 18.6.1999, blz. 1.

[63] PB L 248 van 16.9.2002, blz.1.

[64] PB L 357 van 31.12.2002, blz. 1.

[65] PB L 184 van 17.7.1999, blz.23.

[66] PB L 174 van 27.6.2001, blz. 25.

[67] See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.