Bijlagen bij COM(2023)702 - Wijziging van Richtlijn 92/106/EEG met betrekking tot een steunkader voor intermodaal vervoer van goederen en van Verordening 2020/1056 met betrekking tot de berekening van externekostenbesparingen en het genereren van geaggregeerde gegevens

Dit is een beperkte versie

U kijkt naar een beperkte versie van dit dossier in de EU Monitor.

agreement could be reached during the interinstitutional negotiations, the Commission withdrew the proposal in 2001.

In 2016, the Commission conducted a REFIT evaluation, which concluded that the CTD continued to be a relevant instrument for supporting combined transport, but that there was a significant potential for further improving the effectiveness of the CTD as some of the provisions of the CTD were outdated or unclear, providing significant room for ambiguous interpretation of the Directive and therefore a non-harmonised implementation.

Subsequently the Commission made a new proposal in 2017 to amend the CTD with a focus on clarifying the definition in light of existing case law and complaints without changing the approach based on fixed distances for different parts of the operation. It also proposed to promote investments into terminal infrastructure and considerably improve the fiscal and economic support tools.

While all Member States welcomed the amendment and supported the objective to improve the competitiveness of combined transport, any proposals to extend the eligibility, and in particular to extend the scope to operations in Member States, were met rather with resistance. Similarly, many Member States were against an obligation to facilitate the increase of terminal capacity, while they could agree on an obligation to promote terminal investments. As regards an increased support to combined transport operations Member States views diverged, meaning Member States did not support a harmonised mandatory support, but an obligation to provide support when the choice of support tool was left to the Member States. The current proposal has been prepared keeping those Member States’ concerns in mind.

The European Parliament broadly supported the proposal, proposed further ambition as regards the economic support, but also requested some exemptions. Several amendments introduced by the co-legislators modified the proposal in a manner which, if adopted, would have significantly reduced the ambition and effectiveness of the Commission proposal. Therefore, the Commission withdrew its proposal.

1.5.4.    Compatibility with the Multiannual Financial Framework and possible synergies with other appropriate instruments

The proposed Directive is a key deliverable of the Communication from the Commission on a Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy (SSMS), which sets out the EU vision for the transport system of the future. The strategy announced that the Commission is planning to conduct a review of the regulatory framework for intermodal transport, including the Combined Transport Directive (under Flagship 4 – Greening Freight Transport).

The Directive will create synergies with other transport policies and pieces of the EU regulatory framework which either target the environmental performance of individual modes and the transport system or the internalisation of external costs. As regards the environmental performance, those pieces include notably Regulation (EU) 2019/1242, COM(2021) 557 and COM(2021) 559. Measures targeting the internalisation of external costs include carbon pricing, infrastructure charges, energy and vehicle taxes.

The proposal is compatible with the Multiannual Financial Framework. The initiative requires funding to finance at least three market studies necessary to comply with the reporting obligations established under the Directive and a study to assess whether there is a need to develop a terminal categorisation/labelling framework as stipulated by the Directive.

1.5.5.    Assessment of the different available financing options, including scope for redeployment

The budgetary implications of this proposal are dealt with under this legislative financial statement. In terms of expenditures, the specific budgetary impact of this initiative is limited to appropriations for studies as mentioned under 1.5.4. The execution of these activities does not require an increase of human resources of the European Commission. Within the current MFF, the needs can be met by redeployment within the transport prerogative budget line for EUR 0.4 million. No additional cost is foreseen within the current MFF. In the post-2027 MFF, the cost for the studies is proposed to be financed through the subsequent MFF, without pre-empting the agreement on the MFF and programmes.

1.6.    Duration and financial impact of the proposal/initiative

 limited duration

    in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY

    Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY for commitment appropriations and from YYYY to YYYY for payment appropriations.

 unlimited duration

Implementation with a start-up period from 2027-2037

followed by full-scale operation.

1.7.    Method(s) of budget implementation planned 

 Direct management by the Commission

 by its departments, including by its staff in the Union delegations;

    by the executive agencies

 Shared management with the Member States

 Indirect management by entrusting budget implementation tasks to:

 third countries or the bodies they have designated;

 international organisations and their agencies (to be specified);

 the EIB and the European Investment Fund;

 bodies referred to in Articles 70 and 71 of the Financial Regulation;

 public law bodies;

 bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the extent that they are provided with adequate financial guarantees;

 bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that are provided with adequate financial guarantees;

 bodies or persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, and identified in the relevant basic act.

If more than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the ‘Comments’ section.

Comments

N/A

2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES 

2.1.    Monitoring and reporting rules 

Specify frequency and conditions.

The Commission will be overall accountable for implementing the proposed Directive as well as for reporting to the European Parliament and the Council (a) on the competitiveness of intermodal transport compared to unimodal road transport prior to the application of the Directive and afterwards (b) every five years on the economic development of intermodal transport in the Union. After ten years the Commission will assess whether the support scheme is still needed.

The tasks directly implemented by DG MOVE will follow the annual cycle of planning and monitoring, as implemented in the Commission and the executive agencies, including reporting the results through the Annual Activity Report of DG MOVE.

2.2.    Management and control system(s) 

2.2.1.    Justification of the management mode(s), the funding implementation mechanism(s), the payment modalities and the control strategy proposed

The Commission and more specifically, DG MOVE, will manage the implementation of the proposed Directive. Funding will be provided through procurement agreements. The expenditure will be implemented through directly managed procurements, in full application of the provisions of the Financial Regulation. The control strategy for procurements and grants in DG MOVE includes specific ex-ante legal, operational and financial controls on the procedures as well as on the signature of contracts and agreements. In addition, expenditure made to procure goods and services is subject to ex-ante and, when necessary, ex-post financial controls. 

2.2.2.    Information concerning the risks identified and the internal control system(s) set up to mitigate them

The risk of error at payment and at closure is expected to remain under 2%.

The potential risks related to the procurement of services of this value are considered low.

These risks are linked to use of procurement procedures: delays, availability of data, timely information to the market, etc. These risks would be covered by the existing mechanisms of the Financial Regulation and mitigated by the set of internal controls deployed by DG MOVE (systematic ex-ante legal and financial controls before publication of calls for proposals and before the award of the contract, monitoring and assessment of deliverables, ex-post audits of expenditure as defined in the yearly Audit work plans).

2.2.3.    Estimation and justification of the cost-effectiveness of the controls (ratio of "control costs ÷ value of the related funds managed"), and assessment of the expected levels of risk of error (at payment & at closure) 

Considering the limited scope and amount of EU funding to be granted, and since beneficiaries of EU funds are regarded as low-risk, the tasks resulting from the proposed Directive are not expected to generate additional control costs beyond the existing cost of controls of DG MOVE.

2.3.    Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities 

Specify existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures, e.g. from the Anti-Fraud Strategy.

The regular Commission prevention and protection measures would apply, specifically:

- Payments for any services are checked by the Commission staff prior to payment, taking into account any contractual obligations, economic principles and good financial or management practice. Anti-fraud provisions (supervision, reporting requirements, etc.) will be included in all contracts concluded between the Commission and recipients of any payments.

- To combat fraud, corruption and other unlawful activities, the provisions of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 883/2013 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) and the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) established by Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 shall apply without restriction.

The Commission further maintains a robust antifraud strategy, CAFS, currently under revision.

In addition, DG MOVE adopted a revised Anti-fraud Strategy (AFS) in 2020. The MOVE AFS is based on the Commission Anti-fraud Strategy and anticipates a specific risk assessment carried out internally to identify the areas most vulnerable to fraud, on the controls already in place, and the actions necessary to improve DG MOVE’s capacity to prevent, detect and correct fraud. 

The contractual provisions applicable to public procurement ensure that audits and on-the-spot checks can be carried out by the Commission services, including OLAF, using the standard provisions recommended by OLAF. 

3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 

3.1.    Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 

Existing budget lines

In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.

Heading of multiannual financial frameworkBudget lineType of
expenditure
Contribution
NumberDiff./Non-diff. 52from EFTA countries 53from candidate countries and potential candidates 54from other third countriesother assigned revenue
102.20.04.01

Diff.NONONONO

3.2.    Estimated financial impact of the proposal on appropriations 

3.2.1.    Summary of estimated impact on operational appropriations 

    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations

    The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Heading of multiannual financial
framework
1Single Market, Innovation and Digital

DG: MOVEYear
2027
TOTAL 55
□ Operational appropriations
Budget line 02.20.04.01Commitments(1a)0,40,4
Payments(2a)0,40,4
TOTAL appropriations
for DG MOVE
Commitments0,40,4
Payments0,40,4


□ TOTAL operational appropriations
Commitments(4)0,40,4
Payments(5)0,40,4
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADING 1
of the multiannual financial framework
Commitments0,40,4
Payments0,40,4

□ TOTAL operational appropriations (all operational headings)Commitments(4)0,40,4
Payments(5)0,40,4
TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes (all operational headings)
(6)
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADINGS 1 to 6
of the multiannual financial framework
(Reference amount)
Commitments=4+ 60,40,4
Payments=5+ 60,40,4


Heading of multiannual financial
framework
7‘Administrative expenditure’

This section should be filled in using the 'budget data of an administrative nature' to be firstly introduced in the Annex to the Legislative Financial Statement (Annex 5 to the Commission decision on the internal rules for the implementation of the Commission section of the general budget of the European Union), which is uploaded to DECIDE for interservice consultation purposes.

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
N
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)TOTAL
DG: <…….>
□ Human resources
□ Other administrative expenditure
TOTAL DG <…….>Appropriations

TOTAL appropriations
under HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework 
(Total commitments = Total payments)

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
2027
Year
2032
Year
2037
Year
tbc
TOTAL
TOTAL appropriations
under HEADINGS 1 to 7
of the multiannual financial framework 
Commitments0,40,60,70,32,0
Payments0,40,60,70,32,0


3.2.2.    Estimated output funded with operational appropriations 

Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)

Indicate objectives and outputs



Year
N
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)TOTAL
OUTPUTS
Type 56

Average costNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostNoCostTotal NoTotal cost
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1 57
- Output
- Output
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 1
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2 ...
- Output
Subtotal for specific objective No 2
TOTALS

3.2.3.    Summary of estimated impact on administrative appropriations 

    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of appropriations of an administrative nature

    The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an administrative nature, as explained below:

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
N 58
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)TOTAL

HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework
Human resources
Other administrative expenditure
Subtotal HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework

Outside HEADING 7 59
of the multiannual financial framework

Human resources
Other expenditure
of an administrative nature
Subtotal
outside HEADING 7
of the multiannual financial framework

TOTAL

The appropriations required for human resources and other expenditure of an administrative nature will be met by appropriations from the DG that are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

3.2.3.1.    Estimated requirements of human resources

    The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources.

    The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:

Estimate to be expressed in full time equivalent units

Year
2025
Year
2026
Year 2027Year N+3Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
□ Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff)
20 01 02 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices)
20 01 02 03 (Delegations)
01 01 01 01  (Indirect research)
01 01 01 11 (Direct research)
Other budget lines (specify)
□ External staff (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE) 60

20 02 01 (AC, END, INT from the ‘global envelope’)0000
20 02 03 (AC, AL, END, INT and JPD in the delegations)
XX 01 xx yy zz   61

- at Headquarters

- in Delegations
01 01 01 02 (AC, END, INT - Indirect research)
01 01 01 12 (AC, END, INT - Direct research)
Other budget lines (specify)
TOTAL0

XX is the policy area or budget title concerned.

The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.

Description of tasks to be carried out:

Officials and temporary staff
External staff

3.2.4.    Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework 

The proposal/initiative:

    can be fully financed through redeployment within the relevant heading of the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

The initiative is financed by the transport policy support budget line (02.20.04.01), no reprogramming is required.

    requires use of the unallocated margin under the relevant heading of the MFF and/or use of the special instruments as defined in the MFF Regulation.

Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned, the corresponding amounts, and the instruments proposed to be used.

    requires a revision of the MFF.

Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.

3.2.5.    Third-party contributions 

The proposal/initiative:

    does not provide for co-financing by third parties

    provides for the co-financing by third parties estimated below:

Appropriations in EUR million (to three decimal places)

Year
N 62
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)Total
Specify the co-financing body 
TOTAL appropriations co-financed


3.3.    Estimated impact on revenue 

    The proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.

    The proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:

    on own resources

    on other revenue

please indicate, if the revenue is assigned to expenditure lines     

EUR million (to three decimal places)

Budget revenue line:Appropriations available for the current financial yearImpact of the proposal/initiative 63
Year
N
Year
N+1
Year
N+2
Year
N+3
Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
Article ………….

For assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.


Other remarks (e.g. method/formula used for calculating the impact on revenue or any other information).


(1)

   Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’), OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1-17.

(2)

   COM(2019)640 final.

(3)

   COM(2021) 400 final.

(4)

   REPowerEU: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en

(5)

   Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States

(6)

   EU 'Save Energy', COM(2022) 240 final.

(7)

   COM(2020) 789 final.

(8)

   Combined transport is a subset of intermodal transport meeting the definition in the CTD.

(9)

   Council Directive 75/130//EEC of 17 February 1975 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined road/rail carriage of goods between Member States, OJ L 48, 22.2.1975

(10)

   SWD(2016) 140 final.

(11) COM(2019) 640 final.
(12)

   COM(2021) 812 final

(13)

   This included 11 public authorities (CZ, two public authorities from BE, AT, three public authorities from FR, NO, IT, DE, SE), 49 industry stakeholders, four citizens and six responses under the category ‘others’.

(14)

   European Court of Auditors (2023), op. cit.

(15)

   14 out of 31 industry respondents and 4/8 authorities.

(16)

   Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’), OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1-17.

(17)

   COM(2019)640 final.

(18)

   REPowerEU: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal/repowereu-affordable-secure-and-sustainable-energy-europe_en

(19)

   EU 'Save Energy', COM(2022) 240 final.

(20)

   COM(2021) 400 final.

(21)

   COM(97) 243 final.

(22)

   COM(2011) 144 final.

(23)

   Regulation (EU) 2019/1242

(24)

   COM(2021) 557 final

(25)

   The SSMS sets a milestone for all external costs of transport within the EU to be covered by the transport users at the latest by 2050.

(26)

   https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13134-International-freight-and-passenger-transport-increasing-the-share-of-rail-traffic_en

(27)

   Council Directive 96/53/EC of 25 July 1996 laying down for certain road vehicles circulating within the Community the maximum authorized dimensions in national and international traffic and the maximum authorized weights in international traffic, OJ L 235, 17.9.1996, p. 59–75. It allows heavier and longer road vehicles to be used in intermodal transport, including combined transport road legs.

(28)

   Regulation (EU) 2020/1056

(29)

    COM(2021) 324 final.

(30)

   Comparative analysis of transhipment technologies for intermodal transport and their costs, PWC, KombiConsult 2022, https://transport.ec.europa.eu/news/study-analyses-transhipment-options-more-competitive-intermodal-transport-and-terminal-capacity-ten-2022-05-05_en  

(31)

   COM(2021) 812 final. 

(32)

   Regulation (EU) 1055/2020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 amending Regulations (EC) No 1071/2009, (EC) No 1072/2009 and (EU) No 1024/2012 with a view to adapting them to developments in the road transport sector, OJ L 249, 31.7.2020, p. 17–32.

(33)

   Actions for annulment in respect of this provision have been lodged with the Court of Justice by some Member States (C-542/20, Lithuania v. Parliament and the Council, C-545/20, Bulgaria v. Parliament and the Council, C-547/20, Romania v. Parliament and the Council and C-554/20, Poland v. Parliament and the Council).

(34) SWD (2016) 140 final
(35)

   CE Delft (2019). 

(36)

   To ensure sufficiently precise comparison of operations, it would be necessary to continue updating the Handbook on regular basis, taking into account the latest scientific evidence. In addition, consistency and complementarity with the upcoming CEEU has to be ensured.

(37) Platforms for business-to-authorities (B2A) electronic data exchange established according to Regulation (EU) 2020/1056.
(38) OJ C , , p. .
(39) OJ C , , p. .
(40) Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) (OJ L 243, 9.7.2021, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1119/oj).
(41) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, REPowerEU Plan (COM(2022) 230 final).
(42) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All EU Action Plan: 'Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil' (COM(2021) 400 final).
(43)

   Council Directive 92/106/EEC of 7 December 1992 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of combined transport of goods between Member States (OJ L 368, 17.12.1992, p.38, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/106/oj).

(44)

   Judgment of 7 May 1991, Commission / Italy (C-45/89, ECR 1991 p. I-2053) ECLI:EU:C:1991:185.

(45)

   Regulation (EU) 1056/2020 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2020 on electronic freight transport information (OJ L 249, 31.7.2020, p. 33, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2020/1056/oj).

(46)

   Handbook on the external costs of transport. European Commission. Version 2019 – 1.1, Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-76-18184-2

(47)

   Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of vehicles for the use of road infrastructures (OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1999/62/oj).

(48) OJ L 123, 12.5.2016, p. 1.
(49) Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 1313, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/182/oj).
(50) OJ C 369, 17.12.2011, p. 14.
(51) As referred to in Article 58(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
(52) Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-differentiated appropriations.
(53) EFTA: European Free Trade Association.
(54) Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidates from the Western Balkans.
(55) Beyond 2027, the cost of the proposal is estimated at EUR 0.6 million in 2032, EUR 0.7 million in 2037 and a final additional EUR 0.3 million later bringing the total costs for the EU budget to EUR 2 million, which is proposed to be financed through the subsequent MFFs, without pre-empting the agreement on the MFFs and programmes.
(56) Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
(57) As described in point 1.4.2. ‘Specific objective(s)…’
(58) Year N is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts. Please replace "N" by the expected first year of implementation (for instance: 2021). The same for the following years.
(59) Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former ‘BA’ lines), indirect research, direct research.
(60) AC= Contract Staff; AL = Local Staff; END= Seconded National Expert; INT = agency staff; JPD= Junior Professionals in Delegations.
(61) Sub-ceiling for external staff covered by operational appropriations (former ‘BA’ lines).
(62) Year N is the year in which implementation of the proposal/initiative starts. Please replace "N" by the expected first year of implementation (for instance: 2021). The same for the following years.
(63) As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 20 % for collection costs.
Top


EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Brussels, 7.11.2023

COM(2023) 702 final


ANNEX

to the Proposal for a

DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

amending Council Directive 92/106/EEC as regards a support framework for intermodal transport of goods and Regulation (EU) 2020/1056 of the European Parliament and the Council as regards calculation of external costs savings and generation of aggregated data


{SEC(2023) 373 final} - {SWD(2023) 351 final} - {SWD(2023) 352 final}


ANNEX

Indicative list of support measures referred to in Article 3a


Part I: Support measures to reduce the competitiveness gap of combined transport operations compared to unimodal road transport operations

Measures to improve the competitiveness of combined transport operations contributing to the objectives set out in Article 3a(2), point (a), can be implemented through regulatory and non-regulatory adjustments and incentives in national administrative and economic instruments impacting the competitiveness of combined transport operations. Such adjustments and incentives must aim to make combined transport more attractive to the undertakings that decide on the chosen modes, that is to say shippers or undertakings who organise the combined transport operations.

Adjustments and incentives can include measures impacting:

(a)organisation of combined transport operations and parts thereof, including attribution of infrastructure and terminal capacity and priority to intermodal transport; improved management of disruptions during infrastructure construction works, including cooperation between Member States on those matters; simplification of national and local administrative procedures, including those applicable in preparation phase of an operation as well as during the operation;

(b)intermodal operation cost-competitiveness, including road charges and other charges, levies, taxes or fees in relation to the use of transport and intermodal infrastructure, and congestion charges; 

(c)external-cost charges, defined in Article 2 of Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council 1  for zero- and low-emission heavy-duty vehicles, defined in Article 3(11) and (12) of Regulation 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council 2 in intermodal transport,

(d)measures to facilitate the entry into intermodal market for small and medium-sized enterprises, such as facilitation of rent or lease of intermodal loading units, including through guarantees; facilitation of use of intermodal planning platforms or freight consolidation platforms, including through training and awareness campaigns; 

(e)planning and lease conditions for the land suitable for intermodal transhipment terminal development.


Part II: Support measures to increase the upgrade or uptake of technologies improving the efficiency of intermodal transport operations

Measures to support the upgrade or uptake of technologies improving the efficiency of intermodal transport operations set out in Article 3a(2), point (b), can be implemented for example through facilitation or support to the following:

(a)identifying the semi-trailers used in combined transport in accordance with the identification regime established pursuant to international standards ISO6346 or EN13044;

(b)reinforcing the non-craneable semi-trailers to become craneable or an aid for acquiring craneable semi-trailers;

(c)waving the vehicle registration fees and vehicle taxes of craneable standard-size semitrailers;

(d)the integration of connected systems and the automation of operations in combined transport, digital logistics, related information and communication technologies and intelligent transport systems that are necessary for the smooth functioning of intermodal transport operations such as support for investments into intermodal transhipment terminal photogates and automatic check-in/check-out booth;

(e)measures to facilitate the introduction of an intermodal waybill on their territory;

(f)the low-and zero emission vehicles or vessels or transhipment equipment in combined transport;

(g)accessories for existing technology for transhipment of containers to allow transhipment of semi-trailers such as gantry crane grapple arms for vertical transhipment of semi-trailers.’


(1) Directive 1999/62/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 1999 on the charging of vehicles for the use of road infrastructures (OJ L 187, 20.7.1999, p. 42, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1999/62/oj).
(2) Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles and amending Regulations (EC) No 595/2009 and (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Directive 96/53/EC (OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 202, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1242/oj).
Top

×
Timeline legend

Initial legal act

Another version

Selected version

Selected version application period

Hidden intermediate versions

Version which is applicable today

Future version
All