C-452/17 - ZAKO, preliminary ruling Tribunal de commerce de Liège - Belgium - EU monitor

EU monitor
Woensdag 11 december 2019
kalender

1.

Huidige status

Deze zaak is gesloten op 21/11/2018.
 

2.

Kerninformatie

Zaak C-452/17
Vorming van de rechtbank
  • Fourth Chamber
Aanvrager Zako SPRL Defendant: Sanidel SA Questions referred 1. Must Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents 1 be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to seek and visit customers or suppliers outside of the business premises of the principal? 2. Must Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to carry out no tasks other than those relating to the negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal or to the negotiation and conclusion of such transactions on behalf of and in the name of the principal? 3. If the second question is answered in the negative, must Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to carry out tasks other than those relating to the negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal, or to the negotiation and conclusion of such transactions on behalf of and in the name of the principal, only secondarily? ____________1 OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17.
Verweerder Sanidel SA Questions referred 1. Must Article 1(2) of Council Directive 86/653/EEC of 18 December 1986 on the coordination of the laws of the Member States relating to self-employed commercial agents 1 be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to seek and visit customers or suppliers outside of the business premises of the principal? 2. Must Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to carry out no tasks other than those relating to the negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal or to the negotiation and conclusion of such transactions on behalf of and in the name of the principal? 3. If the second question is answered in the negative, must Article 1(2) of Directive 86/653/EEC be interpreted as requiring the commercial agent to carry out tasks other than those relating to the negotiation of the sale or purchase of goods on behalf of the principal, or to the negotiation and conclusion of such transactions on behalf of and in the name of the principal, only secondarily? ____________1 OJ 1986 L 382, p. 17.
Datum indiening verzoekschrift 27-07-2017
Datum van levering 21-11-2018

3.

Bronnen en disclaimer

Zie voor uitgebreidere informatie eventueel ook de volgende voor dit zaak-dossier gebruikte bronnen:
Dit zaak-dossier wordt iedere nacht automatisch samengesteld op basis van bovenstaande bronnen. Hierbij is aan de technische programmering veel zorg besteed. Een garantie op de juistheid van de gebruikte bronnen en het samengestelde resultaat kan echter niet worden gegeven.